179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
EggyToast
To:
Date:
Fri, 17 Jan 2003 14:56:52 -0500
Subject:
RE: [idm] 2003: The Year the Music Industry Dies - but who gets hurt?
Msg-Id:
<a0501040bba4e10775a42@[128.220.50.51]>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.LNX.4.44.0301171313460.5209-100000@pidgin.eecs.harvard.edu>
Mbox:
idm.0301.gz
quoted 4 lines So who gets hurt who might not anyway with decreasing record sales? No>So who gets hurt who might not anyway with decreasing record sales? No >category that I can think of. As I said, this isn't exhaustive, so if >people come up with new categories, I'm all game. >
Simple. The artists can gain by going directly to their fan base, right? The pop stars are still making money, because they're all about the merchandising, right? So it's the people releasing the information in the first place -- the spin doctors, PR people, scouts, and middle-management that stand to lose everything. Their jobs are created around the music "industry" remaining just that -- assembly line, predictable music that they can create a demand for. And they're the ones who aren't even in to making or really listening to music. They're in it because it's a business. They know that regardless of what changes, the artists and listers are still going to be there for each other, and that listeners would be happy to pay artists directly. And that's why they employ such silly scare tactics as "$ lost to pirates, yar." derek -- eggytoast.com -------------- commerce soon: eggtastic.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org